The court dismissed the petition and observed that this writ cannot stand after this amended law. Petitioner, Chaudhry Nazir Ahmed, through Aftab Ahmed Bajwa, submitted that he had filed the petition before amendment in the act and this act has no retrospective act. He also said that the amended act was also against the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution. He submitted that Kamran did not enjoy good reputation as number of corruption stories against him were published in newspapers.
The court dismissed the petition and observed that this writ cannot stand after this amended law. Petitioner, Chaudhry Nazir Ahmed, through Aftab Ahmed Bajwa, submitted that he had filed the petition before amendment in the act and this act has no retrospective act. He also said that the amended act was also against the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution. He submitted that Kamran did not enjoy good reputation as number of corruption stories against him were published in newspapers.