It is amazing that our Foreign Office continues to repeat the same old narrative revolving around Pakistan not having any safe havens for the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani Network when the US and Afghanistan have openly refuted this and most if not all the rest of the world apparently does not believe it. The constant repetition achieves little except eroding further Pakistan's word and credibility. There has even been a suggestion of late that if there are any Afghan terrorists here, they have melded into the Afghan refugees on our soil and therefore the sooner these refugees return the better. Now innocent refugees are going to suffer for things they are not responsible for. Although anger is growing in Kabul, Washington has an interesting dual attitude. US Joint Staff Director Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie has denied any US plans to conduct military operations within Pakistan. However, this probably means no American boots on Pakistani ground but does not rule out drone attacks, given that the US military has been authorized to eliminate safe havens in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. At the same time, US civilian and military officials keep reiterating their hopes for Pakistani cooperation against the Afghan insurgents. These messages have been "taken very seriously" by Defence Minister Khurram Dastgir Khan, especially the 'elimination of safe havens' bit. While Islamabad, Kabul and Washington continue to arm wrestle each other, the regional dimensions of the Afghan conflict are asserting themselves. China is reportedly seeking a military base in Afghanistan's remote Wakhan Corridor to prevent Uighur militants of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) slipping into Xinjiang. The ETIM was formerly based in our FATA but has reportedly shifted to Afghanistan after the military operations by the Pakistan army to cleanse FATA of terrorist groups. China of course has more than just security on its mind. Its ambitious One Belt One Road initiative, of which CPEC is an integral part, requires peace and stability in the region, starting with Afghanistan, which Beijing says could join CPEC when conditions allow. Our friend China has been supportive of a peace process in Afghanistan for long. Pakistan must recalibrate its Afghan policy by abandoning notions of the Taliban and Haqqani Network providing protection to Pakistan's interests. They have not always in the past and are unlikely to in future. It would be far better to resolve to not allow safe havens on our soil and use our influence on the Taliban to persuade them to join talks with Kabul and Washington to bring this longest running war since WWII to a peaceful end, which is in the interests of all stakeholders.
It is amazing that our Foreign Office continues to repeat the same old narrative revolving around Pakistan not having any safe havens for the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani Network when the US and Afghanistan have openly refuted this and most if not all the rest of the world apparently does not believe it. The constant repetition achieves little except eroding further Pakistan's word and credibility. There has even been a suggestion of late that if there are any Afghan terrorists here, they have melded into the Afghan refugees on our soil and therefore the sooner these refugees return the better. Now innocent refugees are going to suffer for things they are not responsible for. Although anger is growing in Kabul, Washington has an interesting dual attitude. US Joint Staff Director Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie has denied any US plans to conduct military operations within Pakistan. However, this probably means no American boots on Pakistani ground but does not rule out drone attacks, given that the US military has been authorized to eliminate safe havens in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. At the same time, US civilian and military officials keep reiterating their hopes for Pakistani cooperation against the Afghan insurgents. These messages have been "taken very seriously" by Defence Minister Khurram Dastgir Khan, especially the 'elimination of safe havens' bit. While Islamabad, Kabul and Washington continue to arm wrestle each other, the regional dimensions of the Afghan conflict are asserting themselves. China is reportedly seeking a military base in Afghanistan's remote Wakhan Corridor to prevent Uighur militants of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) slipping into Xinjiang. The ETIM was formerly based in our FATA but has reportedly shifted to Afghanistan after the military operations by the Pakistan army to cleanse FATA of terrorist groups. China of course has more than just security on its mind. Its ambitious One Belt One Road initiative, of which CPEC is an integral part, requires peace and stability in the region, starting with Afghanistan, which Beijing says could join CPEC when conditions allow. Our friend China has been supportive of a peace process in Afghanistan for long. Pakistan must recalibrate its Afghan policy by abandoning notions of the Taliban and Haqqani Network providing protection to Pakistan's interests. They have not always in the past and are unlikely to in future. It would be far better to resolve to not allow safe havens on our soil and use our influence on the Taliban to persuade them to join talks with Kabul and Washington to bring this longest running war since WWII to a peaceful end, which is in the interests of all stakeholders.